FCC Urges Supreme Court to Reject Wireless Carriers’ Appeal Over Location Data Fines

0
17

The FCC wants to stop carriers from clawing back millions in location data fines…

Federal telecommunications regulators are asking the Supreme Court to reject further judicial review of substantial fines imposed on major U.S. wireless carriers for illegally selling customer location data. In a legal filing, the Federal Communications Commission urged the justices to deny requests to revisit the issue, arguing that previous court rulings upholding the agency’s enforcement powers should stand without additional hearings before the Supreme Court or the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The regulatory dispute stems from massive penalties levied by the FCC in 2024 against the nation’s largest mobile operators after investigations revealed that customer real-time location data was disclosed to third-party aggregators and bounty hunters without consumer consent.

FCC trying to get Supreme Court to stop carriers from getting money back from location data fines (File Photo).

AT&T T -7.15%↓, which paid $57 million to settle its share of the penalties, has since sought to recover those funds following changes in federal administrative law precedents. Meanwhile, T-Mobile TMUS -6.01%↓ continues to challenge its individual multi-million dollar fine in federal court, pushing to have the penalties completely thrown out.

Along with AT&T and T-Mobile, major carriers Verizon VZ -6.45%↓ and Sprint were also targeted in the comprehensive federal probe, bringing the total combined enforcement penalties across the wireless industry to nearly $200 million. The regulatory actions followed years of public scrutiny and congressional inquiries into how cellular network providers managed customer privacy and location data security.

The legal battle escalated after the Supreme Court affirmed the broader administrative enforcement powers of federal agencies, prompting telecom providers to seek alternative appellate routes to invalidate the penalties. Carriers argue that the FCC exceeded its statutory authority under the Communications Act when calculating fine amounts and assessing liability for vendor-level data breaches.

In its latest submission, the FCC countered that reopening the cases would undermine established regulatory oversight and erode statutory privacy protections for mobile subscribers. Agency attorneys maintained that the penalties were legally sound and necessary to penalize past misconduct while deterring future unauthorized sales of sensitive user data across commercial telecommunications networks.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here